Uncategorized

  • NEWS FLASH: Sony's BRILLIANT new flash unit. (No pun intended)

    Wow, remember how I was ranting about "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"??? Well, SOMETIMES that's not true. Sony just did something absolutely brilliant. They completely re-designed the way a flash unit works.

    Check it out!!!

    I think the re-designed swiveling is genius. It is like a built-in flash bracket, almost like a lightsphere now! Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. (Of course ALL on-edge flash-diffusion tools such as the whale-tail are useless on this flash unit, but I still think it's a HUGE step forward in flash design. WAY cool.

    I hope Nikon and Canon are BRAVE enough to adopt this new design. It might be patented though. But wow, way to go Sony!

    =Matt=

  • RUMOR: Most legit looking yet: Nikon D700...

    Well ladies and gentlemen, it has apparently started. The covert cell phone pictures.

    http://www.nikonwatch.com/?p=511

    http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/657828/0

    Cut and paste the URL if you really wanna see. But suffice it to say that this is the most legit looking "leak" we have seen yet. D700 = D3 / D300. Just like I said it would be. They claim to be using the D3's 12 megapixel sensor, too.

    There are still a lot of fishy things about it all that everyone is heatedly debating, but I have seen many a fake leak in my day, and this one looks as close to legit as ever.

    Plus, the two industry gurus who WOULD know, and who would therefore be under an NDA about the camera, have pleaded "no comment". I know it's a stretch, but to me that sorta implies that they're in the know and the camera DOES exist.

    The only thing left for us to guess is the price. The over/under is still $3000 and I'm voting for under at $2999.

    =Matt=

  • (STRONG) OPINION: How can you STAND Lightroom, people??!!??

    I know this is going to be a bit touchy who is a die-hard workflow fan, but here goes...

    Every time I have to fire up Lightroom for whatever reason, I have to do a double-take at how horrible the interface is. How can anybody stand this? It is abysmal. Thumbnails don't display filenames beneath them. The labeling interface is so annoying to manipulate. The filtering system is a joke. What if I want to instantly edit all the photos taken with one of my cameras but not the other? What if I want to instantly edit all the photos taken at ISO 1600 separately? Can you even filter by keywords at all? I really hope so, but even then, nothing beats a dedicated filters panel.

    And all this extraneous stuff is so annoying. Why does there have to be an "add photo to quick collection" button on top of every photo? And all that other info that is displayed over images, yuck. I love how in BR I can just hit command-T and flip-flop between viewing the image alone, and viewing info / ratings etc. Heck, I can set it to display my exposure info beneath EVERY photo!

    Ugh. I'm just so spoiled by the Bridge CS3 interface, that whenever I need one of the minor feature LR has that BR doesn't, I am appalled at the lack of fluidity in the interface. Bridge is just so customizable. I can put my panels anywhere I want. I have my entire hard drive and any external hard drive / CD / DVD etc. at my fingertips in the folders panel, without importing anything. How does a Lightroom user peruse an archived DVD to find one photo they're looking for? How do you export original photos to a print file and still view them in LR?

    As you can tell, part of my frustration may come from simply not understanding LR. But I do pride myself in picking things up quickly; I adapted to Bridge effortlessly, it is just so intuitive. And I have never seen an interface more confusing than Lightroom's. (Other than some of those made by MS, *ahem*...)

    The only saving grace LR has is instant (roll-over) preset preview, which I don't really miss that much.

    Whatever... I managed to wrangle it into doing what I needed. (Offsetting time-stamp again. Ugh, I can't wait till I have both of my own cameras back. The clocks on those bad boys are never more than a second or two apart...) Alas, the D300 is still in for service. But that's a big 'ol snafu that I don't have the time to talk about right now...

    Peace out everybody. If you're using LR, GET OFF THE BANDWAGON! SERIOUSLY TRY BRIDGE CS3! My workflow could not be as fast as it is without it!

    =Matt=

  • OPINION: Sigma 50 1.4 image quality a GRAND SLAM!!!

    Well, the first reports and tests of image sharpness are coming in for the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM.

    Let me just put it this way: the lens is SO SHARP, people are rumor-ing that Sigma actually designed the lens as a 50mm f/1.2, and limited it to f/1.4. The sharpness is on par with CZ. (And when I say CZ, I mean Carl Zeiss, baby!)

    Basically, both the Canon and Nikon 50 1.4's just got SERVED, and the Canon 50 1.2 is going to have some major competition especially in the value department. At $499, the Sigma is un-beatable. Contrast is fantastic. Distortion / aberration is not bad at all. Color of course may not be what a Canon L lens is, but I've never had a problem getting fantastic colors out of my two pro Sigma lenses so far...

    At least, that's what the PRELIMINARY REPORTS are showing. So only time will tell, but so far things are looking VERY good.

    100% crops:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/86658347@N00/

    bokeh:

    http://bbs.kakaku.com/bbs/10505011993/SortID=7939174/ImageID=70329/

    As soon as I have $500 to burn, I'm getting "in the waiting line" for this lens. It looks like all FOUR of my equipment repairs are going to cost me less than $200 total, so I guess I could celebrate that by spending $500, right?

    =Matt=

    PS: Nikon may make an announcement tomorow...

  • NEWS FLASH: NEW Canon DSLR!!!

    Made you look! Well, I made all the advanced, semi-professional camera addicts look. What I speak of is indeed a new Canon DSLR, HOWEVER, what we are talking about is the 1000D, the Rebel XS. Basically, Canon is attempting to make the lowest-end, most affordable DSLR ever.

    Here's the name game they're playing: First, they came out with the 300D, the digital rebel. Then they came out with the 350D, the rebel XT. Then the 400D, the XTi. Then this past January, they "skipped" right to "rebel XSi" and nobody noticed. Noticed what? Well, there was an XT and an XTi, so why would they skip XS and go straight to XSi? Exactly. So now here's the XS. Just slightly out of order, but whatever.

    Basically it IS indeed an upgrade to the rebel XT. It's basically an XT but with a few of the "cutting edge" new stuff, like live view. No features were really "upgraded" really, other than maybe the 2.5" LCD compared to the XT's dinky 1.8" LCD.

    The kicker, in theory, is supposed to be the price. Legend had it that Canon was cooking up a dirt-cheap DSLR, somewhere along the lines of $299 w/o a lens, or $399 with a (stabilized!!!) kit lens.

    That would indeed tempt many new people into the world of DSLR's, even though most of US camera geeks aren't really going to bat an eye at the 1000D.

    But, if initial specs and reports are true, Canon didn't pull it off with the pricing. It sounds like the XS / 1000D will still retail for over $500. o_O ...Yeah, I dunno who's gonna buy that. I'm still going to highly recommend that if someone wants to get into DSLRs for cheap, the best thing to do is to buy a used Nikon D70s or D40. They ARE dirt cheap, and are more feature-rich than this XS.

    Pretty bummed that Nikon didn't announce anything. Maybe the D90 will still come in the next few weeks before summer gets into full swing, but I doubt we'll see anything professional until Photokina this fall...

    Signing out!
    =Matt=

  • RUMOR: Nikon's got something coming in the next few days...

    You heard it here first, folks. By this weekend, we may have some more Nikon stuff. Possibly the D90, possibly a "mk2" of the 70-200 2.8 VR, and/or possibly some "mk2" f/1.4 primes. Who knows. The next 72 hours will tell...

    =Matt=

    [EDIT] Well, so far zip. Probably not going to see anything from Nikon until July, at the earliest, with August being the most likely. (trying a little reverse- psychology here, in case you couldn't tell...)

    Actually, we do have these two (probably fake) photos of the Nikon D10, so that's at least worth a little excitement!

  • OPINION: Technology Assassinates Tradition.

    With each new technological advance we see, it seems to me that some tried-and-true tradition, some conventional feature, is quietly assassinated in some back alley by a deadly ninja.

    Now while I'm all in favor of ninjas being able to find good, stable work, I am saddened to see certain things go.

    What the heck am I talking about? Well these days, it happens to be the OPTICAL VIEWFINDER whose murder is quietly being plotted.

    Most notably, optical viewfinders have been completely eliminated from all but a select few "point and shoot" digital compact cameras. If you wanna take a picture, you gotta use that battery-sucking LCD on the back of the camera.

    We took quite a step backwards when we went from full-frame 35mm viewfinders to 1.5x and 1.6x etc. DSLR viewfinders. Especially in consumer cameras, viewfinders were like looking through a tunnel. You couldn't manual focus for beans. (Oh and speaking of manual focus, split-prism viewfinders have been six feet under for years now...)

    Then we started brainwashing people that "full-frame" was the only hope. When in reality, cameras like the Canon 5D actually have a pretty cheap, small viewfinder, that is actually almost surpassed in size and brightness by a D300 viewfinder. (Which is one reason I love my D300- It is DX, but Nikon has FINALLY taken a no-compromises approach to viewfinders and made it a top priority.)

    Then, right when camera makers were just barely starting to increase their viewfinder size, along comes live view. Namely, and the spark that ignited this blog entry, the new Sony DSLR's. Praised for their brilliant execution of live view, which allows full-speed autofocus during live view, Sony has secretly hired another ninja and sicced them on optical viewfinders- They sacrificed a TON of viewfinder size in order to make the whole live view thing work. It's complicated, so don't ask, but suffice it to say that the Sony A350, their new flagship amateur / semi-pro camera, has one of the smallest viewfinders in the history of DSLR's, period.

    Sony claims to be aiming squarely at the professional market, saying they will even push out Canon and/or Nikon for the #1 or #2 spot in the industry. Well if you ask me, they just shot themselves in the foot. If they want to be serious about convincing actual professionals to use their gear, they had better stop GOOFING AROUND with turning DSLR's into just another electronic gadget. The day that a feature so conventional as a big, bright viewfinder is compromised, that's the day I'll stop buying new DSLRs, period.

    =Matt=

  • MY NEWS: Almost EVERYTHING in for service...

    I'm lucky enough to have very little to shoot this month, until the 27th when I have a wedding. I'm UN-lucky enough to be needing to send in practically EVERY piece of digital equipment that I own for service, all at once.

    My D300, as is typical for any camera hot off the production line, had a couple of the grip rubbers begin to peel off on me. This is one thing Nikon is notorious for, and it is the trade-off we all have to live with if we want to keep the oh-so-grippy rubber grip design. It also could use a bit of focus calibration, and a resistor in the battery life monitor might be a little out of spec.

    Part of the miracle that is the D300 is it's battery life. They REALLY stretched it this time, getting 1000+ shots out of one battery easily, even with heavy LCD chimping and/or flash use. (The D200 got about 250 shots, on the exact same battery...) Since I don't use vertical battery grips on any of my cameras, and since I sometimes find myself miles and miles from an electrical outlet too, I do like to get as much performance out of each battery as possible and I'm ecstatic that Nikon has accomplished what they have. Well apparently in order to squeeze every last drop of battery juice out of the D300, they modified the transistors in the D300's electrical supply pipeline somehow. Some of the transistors must be slightly out of spec, because every now and then they fail to correctly read the battery life and they'll tell you that your battery is dead when it isn't. Since it's too late to make a long story short, I'll just keep going- this apparently has to do either with the transistors associated with the battery juice intake itself, or with the camera-to-lens contact interface. People report that it will happen frequently with certain lenses, and never with others... Lenses have transistors as well you see, since they consume power, (especially 2.8 VR lenses like the 70-200...) and basically, this "brand new, high-tech" D300 is just stretching the battery power a little too far for some of the high-drain lenses out there. And so the high-tech battery life monitoring system is not able to read correctly sometimes. Bummer.

    (Newer Nikon DSLR's have a 3-pin battery that allows a 5-level readout for the power remaining, and then in the camera menu a full 0-100% battery life readout, a shots-taken counter, and a 5-level readout for the battery health. (lifespan) Yeah. Like I said, high-tech. I really like having it, though, but sadly it appears this battery monitoring system is what is causing the false readout.

    I always find it ironic that the further we advance technology, the more bugs come up. Go figure.

    All in all though, I definitely wouldn't trade the gear I have for anything else.

    Oh and speaking of the gear "I wouldn't trade for anything else", LOL:

    My 17-55mm 2.8 DX got it's focus shifted pretty severely somehow, such that if shot improperly you could be stopped down all the way to f/8 and still not get sharp images. (Luckily I learned how to re-focus and work around it, though, so I managed to survive the overflow of work this spring...)

    My Sigma 150mm 2.8 Macro got it's aperture messed up somehow, and all of a sudden performance just wasn't what it used to be at 2.8. It is perfectly fine from f/4 onward, but I like the lens for it's legendary sharpness at 2.8...

    My Sigma 50-150 2.8 DC's aperture tab is slightly sticky again; it was actually serviced under warranty over a year ago. Again, I bought one of the first lenses off the production line, which you should never do. But the lens was just so gosh darn sweet, I had to have it. I hope they make an OS (stabilization) version, cause I think I'm getting a shakier hand compared to how rock-steady I used to be. Either that or I'm just becoming a sloppy shooter...

    So, I'm down to just my D200 backup body. Ever since I got the D300 I haven't really been putting many miles on the D200. Ironically, I still question it's ability to focus perfectly, but again I might just be getting sloppy. I've got this professional equipment, now I just need to SHOOT like a professional! I'm too rough on my gear, and probably too sloppy in my shooting habits. From a geeky standpoint, at least. I still manage to deliver sharp, high-quality images to my clients, rest assured!

    My father was kind enough to drop off the Nikon gear at the Nikon service center in El Segundo last week since he works nearby. And the UPS guy just dropped by, which was convenient because I needed a signature to ship my box of Sigma lenses since it is insured for $1350...

    The Nikon work should all be under warranty though, and the Sigma lenses I do believe also have a 5-year warranty. If I come out of this without spending much more than a few bucks on shipping, I think I'll celebrate by getting that new Sigma 50mm f/1.4 that I'm so tempted to buy...

    =Matt=

Calendar

May 2019
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031