Uncategorized

  • Sigma innovates YET AGAIN...

    Dang, Nikon / Canon / Pentax / Sony! Get with the program!

    Sigma just released a 10mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM fisheye, and a 4.5mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM CIRCULAR FISHEYE!!!

    This is one reason I just love Sigma. They innovate, and they don't dawdle. Their marketing department doesn't have a death-grip on cropped sensor camera lenses... (wink at Canon)

    So far, COMPMLETELY un-rivaled by any name-brand lens, we have the Sigma 50-150 f/2.8 DC, the 30mm f/1.4 DC, and now the 4.5mm f/2.8 DC. And oh yeah, Tokina has a DX fisheye zoom (which I think I'd like to buy, as cool as circular fisheye is) and a 50-135 f/2.8. But Canon and Nikon, where are YOUR f/2.8 tele zooms for APS-C DSLR's? Where are your fast-apeture primes? And I doubt we'll EVER see a Nikon / Canon circular fisheye or fisheye zoom, sadly...

    I just wish Nikon and Canon would get with the program and start releasing DX and EF-S lenses that real pros want.
    Fast-apeture wide and mid-range primes, most importantly, a Nikon 17mm f/1.4 DX would really hit the spot, as would a 50-150 f/2.8 DX VR.

    What will it take? Will Sigma have to come out with it's own fast-apeture wide angle prime? Will they have to come out with an OS version of their already successful and awesome 50-150 f/2.8?

    It's going to be pretty ironic when I eventually have ZERO Nikon lenses... Oh wait I do want the 85mm f/1.4. Oh wait, it's AF-D screw drive, nevermind, I want a silent wave motor update (equivalent to USM for you Canon shooters. That's another area where Nikon needs to get with the program- AF-S updates to the fast-apeture primes. PLEASE! We can't all afford those big fat pro bodies that focus lightning fast, we need more SWM!)

    =Matt=

  • Taking my business elsewhere...

    I only wish that I had the impact on the world of photography that some well-known pros have, because I've really got something to say this time...

    Oh and I hope you're sitting down when you read this, cause the 2nd part might be a bit of a shocker...

    I'll probably never be shopping at Samy's anymore. In the past I've gone in because they've got an incredible selection, being a big chain store, especially when it comes to camera bags. Camera bag preference is one thing that is SO subjective that I cannot possibly imagine just ordering a bag online sight-unseen. Both of the camera bags I've bought were from Samy's, actually.

    They have this tactic however that has inclined me never to purchase there again, probably. Basically what happens is that they price all their merchandise at or just above MSRP, easily 20-30% over what you would pay from a reputable online dealer. Then, they try and win you over by offering about a 10% discount, usually saying "for you, we'll make it this much, is that cool?" While I do understand that one can expect to pay a LITTLE more for the service and convenience of buying something in person, the Samy's price hike is just plain huge, in fact it's in-consistent with other local stores even... Off the top of my head, I paid $17.99 for a strap at ProPhoto Connection (which isn't even a chain)and then paid $20.99 or something for another one at Samy's. I also paid $200 for a camera bag at Samy's, and then saw it for $169.95 at Calumet, right down the street almost. Mind you that $200 was marked down from Samy's list price of $220, of course...

    So, while you MIGHT be able to expect to pay the going price on the HOTTEST items, like the very newest DSLR bodies, I can't recommend buying anything else there...

    Next, (you're sitting down, right?) I'm having some very frustrating focus issues with my new D200. The 85mm f/1.4 that I rented had some serious back-focusing, as well as the 70-200 VR I just rented and the Sigma 50-150 that I own. The 85mm f/1.4 back-focused so strongly that I couldn't use it at all any closer than maybe 20-30 feet. My other lenses, as well as the 50mm f/1.4 that I tinkered with at Calumet today, have either no focusing errors, or they front-focus.

    Given these irregularities, I'm not sure Nikon can even "fix" the problem, if there even IS a problem. Which prompts me to seriously consider another camera system, either Canon or Olympus. Which would be an incredible shame because Nikon bodies and the D200 (or better) in particular are by far the best-designed bodies out there, in my humble opinion.

    However I'm not dumb enough to think that focus errors don't exist with ALL camera companies. So any decisions, any "switches" will not be made without MUCH research and testing, to be sure.

    My first order of business I guess will be to see if Nikon can make my D200 focus reliably. Then if not, I'll be at Calumet in Encinitas on Nov. 20th to test out the new D300 and D3, and I'll also have to rent or borrow some Canon / Olympus gear. The new Olympus E-3, with it's "world's fastest AF" and two f/2.0 zoom lenses is/are definitely begging to be test-driven...

    Also, any Nikon shooters out there who wish to help me restore my faith, if you've got a fast apeture prime lens you'd like to let me test out, please let me know and let's try and hang out ASAP! (I'll buy you dinner?) I have another wedding in two weekends and I'm very tempted to rent something from the "other side of the fence"...

    =Matt=

  • So, I've been holding a lot of new gear lately...

    So, I've been dropping in at Calumet a lot lately, I've been talking to the guys in there. Believe it or not, I've actually found a group of camera store employees who are really cool people! They don't push gear on you, they talk sensibly, they're very un-biased as far as Canon VS Nikon VS others, and if you drop by at a time of day when it's not busy, they'll let you hold and shoot with various cameras as much as you want... Sure, it's an un-written law that you ought to pay your "dues" and spend a couple hundred bucks on accessories and things so that they start to know you as a "regular", but that was fine with me because I needed an Expo Disc and three D200 batteries anyway! (and rental gear on a regular basis too...)

    So, I got to shoot for a minute or two with the new Canon 40D and the 50mm f/1.2 L. SWEET!!! I can highly recommend the 40D and maybe a 50mm f/1.4 to any and all my Canon shooting friends... You already know my advice on purchasing, based on which camera you currently have, what your budget is, and what you like to shoot. Long story short, all three cameras, the 20D, 30D, and 40D get my "seal of approval" as far as their VALUE is concerned...

    I don't care what the complainers say, the 3" LCD is beautiful and big, and in fact I'm almost not happy that Nikon's D300 screen is "HD", because that'll just waste battery power if you ask me...

    The buttons being along the bottom instead of the side is no problem. The delete button is smartly indented a little bit more than the other buttons, just to name one small little feature that makes me realize how well thought out this camera is. Speaking of buttins, there is also a dedicated AF-ON button finally! Although EVERYONE really wishes they'd take that silly "direct print" button and make it a "func button" ala Nikon, but I dunno if Canon's marketing department will ever let that happen...

    Oh and auto-ISO, yayy!! I use this on a regular basis with my Nikons, it is quite useful... (However the 40D is limited to only 400-800 ISO, which is just ONE stop of adjustment lol... It can drop down to ISO 100 to avoid over-exposure in extreme circumstances however. But considering how amazing the ISO 1600 is, I really wish they had included it in all the auto-ISO fun. With the D200 it's very straightforward- you start at ISO 100, you pick the max ISO from 200 to 1600, and you pick the minimum shutter speed, at which ISO starts automatically going up. Very handy, because sometimes you're shooting wide angle and you can get away with 1/60 sec, but sometimes you're shooting tele and you need 1/250 sec.)

    You no longer lose images if you accidentally open the CF door while taking pictures, that's handy!

    Bokeh with an f/1.8 or faster lens is simply gorgeous... With the 50mm f/1.2, I was able to step WAY back from a subject and still throw the background incredibly out of focus. I can't exactly recommend the f/1.2 lens when the f/1.4 non-L is just $300 or so and pretty much just as good.

    However, there's one thing that maybe some 40D users can help me with:
    For as long as I've been using Canon SLR's, I've noticed that the command dials control the exposure in a counter-intuitive direction with relation to the exposure scale that is displayed inside the viewfinder. What I mean is, turn the dail to the left, and the reading on the exposure scale moves to the right. Why? I understand that Canon has "-" on the left and "+" on the right, which is opposite of Nikon, but why aren't the controls set so that you can turn the dial in the intuitive direction based on looking at the exposure scale?

    My question really is, do the newer cameras have a way of REVERSING the control direction? That would be awesome, and it would DEFINITELY help shooters who "make the switch" from Nikon to Canon. That way long-time Canon users can keep on shooting the way they've gotten so used to over the years, while any new shooters who might be coming from Nikon can keep on shooting the way THEY used to shoot with their Nikon cameras.

    No, I am not considering switching. (Although I often consider ADDING a Canon to my arsenal, big difference) However if any Canon shooters want to switch to Nikon hehe, just know that the command dials on all the pro and semi-pro cameras can be set to work both "forward" and "reversed"... Oh and you can designate which command dial controls which setting, but I think you can do that with Canon DSLR's as well. (I like my apeture to be on the rear dial and my shutter speed to be on the front dial, whereas MOST people set the apeture to be controlled by the front dial... This was something I even set on my D70!)

    If not now then hopefully soon Canon DSLR's will come with reversible command dials...

    Other than that, I can highly recommend the 40D, especially at it's price point.

    In other news, previous jokes aside I've decided that some day I want to have the impact on the world of DSLR's that the likes of Thom Hogan and Ken Rockwell have. In fact, I'd love to be a Nikon rep or something; it sounds like one of the greatest jobs a geek like me could possibly have. And unlike the fanboy type geeks who bash the competition and try to shove THEIR system down your throat, I try to be as well-rounded, level-headed as possible, while still firmly supporting Nikon as the brand that I think is the best for many photographers.

    Input / feedback is greatly appreciated!
    =Matt=

  • Olympus E-3

    Ooh, the Olympus E-3 just announced today has indeed turned out to be a tempting camera for my greatest pasttime, adventure photography. I'm seriously considering one, especially since it will cost "only" about $2K...

    10 megapixels, enormous (magnified) viewfinder, 5 FPS, the world's fasted autofocus when used with the new SWD lenses, and a 12-60mm f/2.8-4 lens that is pro-grade, weather sealed; equal to 24-120mm for those of us who still speak 35mm...

    Not to mention the "insanely professional" series f/2.0 zooms that equal about 28-70mm and 70-200mm in 35mm terms. Yes, I said f/2.0 zoom. As big as and possibly more pricey than comparable 28-70 and 70-200 f/2.8 zooms, but still, an f/2.0 zoom!!! The geek factor on that is just almost too much to resist...

    I'd almost swithch for weddings too, if they could come out with a couple more f/1.4 primes and an ISO 6400 ~6 megapixel sensor sidekick camera!

    =Matt=

  • Let's pretend I'm Thom Hogan...

    Alright, here are my 2008 Nikon DSLR body predictions:

    Nikon D3X:
    Same body as the D3, but with a 22 megapixel "FX" sensor. The extra 10 megapixels will probably mean that they have to slow down a little, maybe only 3-5 FPS, and possibly 5-8 FPS in a DX crop mode, somewhere around 10-12 megapixels... Oh and the extra megapixels will also probably hurt the high ISO performance by a stop or two, but this is not a high ISO camera, this is a fashion / commercial / landscape camera, duh! This bad boy will probably cost upwards of $7-8K

    Nikon D3H:
    Same body as the D3, but with a DX LBCAST 12 megapixel sensor that does 8 FPS standard and 12-14 FPS in high-speed crop mode. Its high ISO performance will be head and shoulders above any other 1.5x or 1.6x DSLR ever, busting out better than the D300 and *maybe* as good as the D3. Hopefully it will cost $3-4K.

    Note:
    The D3X in high speed crop mode will obviously NOT trump a D3H; the D3H will not only be thousands cheaper, it will also perform WAY better at high ISO's. The D3H will be the ultimate sports and birding camera, the D3X will be the ultimate fashion, commercial and landscape camera. The D3 will simply go down in history as Nikon's first full-frame 35mm DSLR, and might end up at least a thousand bucks cheaper by the time we see a D3H and X... However it will STILL be a freaking sweet all-around camera, performing especially beautifully at weddings and portrait sessions, thanks to it's shallower DOF than the D3H and better high ISO performance than the D3X.

    Last but not least, here's the camera everyone will talk the most about, Nikon's final triumph, if they can pull it off:

    The D300X, I'll call it.

    What the heck is a D300X, you ask? Well, it will be a D300 with a D3 sensor in it. That's right, ladies and gentlemen, a 5D killer, an ULTIMATE wedding photographer camera, and something to truly drool over. No high speed crop mode, just "FX". Oh and just as the 6 megapixel in the D100, D70, D50 and D40 got progressively better and better, I expect a D300X sensor to be a bit tweaked, and maybe as good as one stop better than the D3 at high ISO.

    Of course don't expect it to blaze, it'll probably do 3-5 FPS max.

    *Disclaimer: By the time we see the D300X, Canon will have a 5D replacement out, and it will probably perform as good as or BETTER than the D300X's sensor. However I expect Canon to continue in it's "advanced amateur" body design with a 5D replacement, basically a 40D with a full frame sensor in it. And the D300X will, like the D300, be a burly semi-pro body. But that's another topic for another blog entry! /Disclaimer

    BTW, with the coolness of the D40 + D40X lineup, don't expect Nikon to worry about debuting any new entry-level cameras...

    However, speaking of the D40/X and it's lack of an AF screw drive, I ALSO expect Nikon to get busy in 2008 with their lens lineup, updating as many lenses as possible to AFS (SWM) instead of the old screw drive. But that's another topic for another blog entry!

    Take care all you DSLR geeks out there!
    =Matt=

  • Touche!

    Well, after all the hooting and hollering from people un-fairly comparing the 40D and D300 (usually bashing the Canon, especially for having a hower resolution LCD screen, which is almost one the dumbest things you could possibly bash)

    ..."Canon" (the fan base, I mean) has struck back with one lesser known point, a point that will probably be another hit to the D300's potential as a D2 / 1D MK3 killer:

    On paper, both new cameras have this newfangled 14 bit RAW engine which is supposed to noticeably increase dynamic range and tonal transitions. (smoothness) However if you look closely, the Canon can do this 14 bit RAW converting at full speed, 6.5 FPS, while if the Nikon wants to do it's max 6 FPS, you've gotta go back to 12 bit RAW. Otherwise, you're stuck shooting 14 bit RAW files at 2.5 FPS, which is about as fast as a Rebel XT. (Wait, I mean the D40. My bad, XT users!)

    Is this going to be a deal-breaker for a lot of buyers? Yep, it sure will be, for the obsessive camera geeks who have nothing better to do than go online and compare cameras for hours on end, and argue about which one is better.

    For real world shooting however, and definitely for myself as someone who shoots almsot everything from weddings to landscape photography, I can't imagine that needing 14 bit RAW files instead of 12 bit RAW's. Heck, when I need 5 FPS, I'm probably shoting JPG anyway. I can imagine the extra tonal power in 14 bit RAW files woul be great for shoting landscapes, but for that you don't really need ANY kind of insanely fast FPS anyway...

    That's all for now folks...

    =Matt=

  • Headline: Used Camera Prices Plummet

    Most notably, used Canon 20D's are now below $700! Wow! For those of you who are "used" to the Canon rebel XT's LCD size but want OTHER features that are improved, such as way better autofocus, way better speed and responsiveness, etc. etc., BUT you're on the same budget that you were on when you got the XT, well, now's your chance! Sell the XT for $400 or so on Ebay and upgrade...

    Then there's the 20D's older brother, the 30D, with a 2.5" LCD screen and not much else of great importance. For those of you who are fed up with 1.8" LCD screens, I guess? Anyway, the 30D is now between $800 and $900, which finally puts it on my list of recommended cameras! Many of my long-time subscribers will know that back when the 30D was $1300 or whatever, I highly un-recommended it, simply because it was hundreds more than the 20D for almost no reason. So now, if you've got a little more cash than the people shopping for 20D's, get a 30D!

    Of course there's the brand new, oh-so-sweet 40D if you've got $1300 to spend, but this post is exclusively about USED gear prices...

    In the full-frame department, we're about to break the $2000 barrier! Both used 5D's and used 1Ds's are about to drop below $2000, and I'm sure it's already happening on Ebay... (I don't shopt here, but you can if you're gutsy!)

    Get a 5D if you're just starting portrait photography, or maybe weddings, and you really just want full-frame for its high ISO performance and shallow depth of field. The 5D is just a 30D with a bigger sensor /viewfinder, and without the pop-up flash.

    Get a 1Ds if you're interested in doing something nuts like going on a trip to India or Antarctica, or some war zone, I dunno. The 1Ds will be a burly, dependable stalwart of a camera that "takes a likcing and keeps on ticking..."

    However, in the 1.3x department, don't expect 1D mk 2's or 1D mk2N's to get that cheap any time soon; thanks to the 1D mk3's strange autofocus issues that is making big-time pro sports shooters who shoot in bright sunlight hesitant to buy. (The 1D mk3 actually boggles your mind at low-light, indoor photography, however, so don't expect THAT camera to get cheap any time soon either!

    Alright, Nikon!

    Used D70 prices, at OVER $600, are way higher than a year ago when I bought my spare for less than $500, including shipping. Probably because of it's popularity, or at least it's relative popularity compared to the D40 and D40X, which are both getting a slightly bad rap right now because they don't have the old screw-type AF motor.

    Other than the D70, all across the board the Nikon DSLR prices are dropping. The D80 is below $800, The D50 is below $500, the D40X is below $600, wow!

    Get a D40 if you're just now getting into photography and want to learn manual control, get a D50 if you want to do that and still use oldschool AF lenses like the 50mm f/1.8, or get the D40X if you're a psycho adventure travel nut who goes to beautiful, remote locations but to whom every last ounce counts... (OR, get an Olympus E-410, which is INSANELY small and light, at just 13 oz... And the E-410 affords you an amazingly sweet lens lineup, many of which lenses are weather sealed even though the E-410 isn't...)

    D2H's are still around $1350 but dropping, however D2HS's are still up around $2500. (but you KNOW that price will fall through the floor if the "D300+BG=8FPS" equation proves to be as sweet as it sounds on paper...)

    I'll expect D2H prices to break below $1000 by the end of the year, and D2HS prices will easily drop below $2000. Just wait till the D3 and D300 hit the market, you'll see!

    Similarly, the D2X price is on it's way down. You can get them in "bargain" condition, or "grey market", for about $2500! Decent condition USA models however are still up above $3000, but that should change by the end of the year.

    I have no idea why, but the D2XS is still $3800 or so. Juuust not worth it, if you ask me, considering the HUGE relative value in the "plain" D2X and the upcoming D300. (Again, especially the D300 with it's battery grip!)

    SO, that's all for now, folks.
    =Matt=

  • ...And Film Is NOT Dead!

    http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-film20sep20,1,7665371.story?track=rss

    It's official, film is NOT dead!

    This article describes exactly how I feel...

    =Matt=

  • It's the PHOTOGRAPHER, NOT THE CAMERA...

    Exhibit A:

    http://photo.net/photos/rarindra

    Images captured with: mostly a Canon powershot P&S and Rebel XT.

    Take care,
    =Matt=

  • The Nikon D3 does a wedding...

    No, I didn't have a D3 with me the other day. I'm talking about Cliff Mautner, a wedding photographer and Nikon Rep "with benefits", if you know what I mean...

    http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/ok-its-after-1a.html

    Check out his blog post, the images are beautiful... (And they are JPG's straight out of the camera, allegedly)

    Wow, I really wish it wasn't $5,000, otherwise I'd buy one in a jiff. Hopefully Nikon will be coming out with a 5D equivalent soon, mayb with the D3 sensor but in a cheaper body? That would be sweet....

    Although still, I'm skeptical as to how much of this newfound advantage has to do with the full-frame sensor. And I'll still be saving up for a D300 first. I'm sure that it does just as good of a job in the hands of a skilled user and with some good f/1.4 primes and f/2.8 zooms, just maybe with 1 stop less DOF and 1-2 stops less high ISO performance. Which, for a $3,200 savings, I can live with.

    =Matt=

Calendar

May 2019
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031